Evidence Review · 02

RayOne Galaxy

Spiral Optics and the Pursuit of Continuous Vision

A spiral refractive strategy for broad functional vision. The review examines where optical testing and early clinical findings converge, and where comparative evidence remains immature.

Read opens the full PDF in a new tab.

Evidence Review · 02 — RayOne Galaxy publication cover

The evidence review in one minute

Three key takeaways

Optics

Independent optical testing supports an extended, relatively smooth and pupil-dependent response.

Extended focus comes with moderated contrast rendering and lower peak quality than a monofocal reference.

Review pp. 03–04 · references 2–4

Clinical

An early multicentre series shows clinically useful binocular range.

The single-arm study enrolled 91 patients; only 25 completed the three-month visit. There was no implanted comparator.

Review p. 05 · reference 1

Uncertainty

Comparative clinical superiority and a reduction in dysphotopsia remain unproven.

Validated quality-of-vision outcomes, mesopic function and longer-term data need stronger evidence.

Review pp. 07–11

The central question

Can a spiral refractive optic broaden functional vision without relying on conventional diffractive light splitting—and can it do so while preserving acceptable visual quality?

The definitive full evidence review

Follow the evidence.

Complete evidence, methods and references are in the PDF.

Download PDF ↓
Read the PDF on this page

If your browser does not display the reader, open the PDF directly.

Publication transparency

These declarations concern OIE and its author. They do not describe the funding or financial relationships of the studies reviewed.

Evidence appraised through 16 September 2026. Version 1.0. Later findings may change interpretation.

Methodology and evidence interpretation →